| 3.8.5 | Energy Benchmarks for Newly Constructed Outpatient Buildings, by Selected City and End-Use | ||||||||||||||||
| (thousand Btu per square foot) | |||||||||||||||||
| IECC Climate Zone | Heating | Cooling | Water Heating | Ventilation | |||||||||||||
| Miami | 1A | 49.4 | 49.3 | 0.7 | 19.5 | ||||||||||||
| Houston | 2A | 58.9 | 41.4 | 0.8 | 19.4 | ||||||||||||
| Phoenix | 2B | 60.3 | 40.6 | 0.7 | 19.9 | ||||||||||||
| Atlanta | 3A | 66.0 | 31.9 | 0.9 | 19.3 | ||||||||||||
| Los Angeles | 3B | 63.8 | 26.4 | 0.9 | 18.3 | ||||||||||||
| Las Vegas | 3B | 57.7 | 32.1 | 0.8 | 19.6 | ||||||||||||
| San Francisco | 3C | 72.1 | 19.8 | 1.0 | 18.5 | ||||||||||||
| Baltimore | 4A | 72.1 | 27.4 | 1.0 | 19.0 | ||||||||||||
| Albuquerque | 4B | 63.5 | 23.7 | 1.0 | 21.7 | ||||||||||||
| Seattle | 4C | 74.7 | 17.7 | 1.0 | 18.5 | ||||||||||||
| Chicago | 5A | 75.3 | 21.3 | 1.1 | 18.8 | ||||||||||||
| Boulder | 5B | 65.9 | 19.3 | 1.1 | 21.0 | ||||||||||||
| Minneapolis | 6A | 81.3 | 19.0 | 1.1 | 18.9 | ||||||||||||
| Helena | 6B | 74.3 | 15.6 | 1.2 | 20.0 | ||||||||||||
| Duluth | 7 | 84.2 | 13.2 | 1.3 | 18.7 | ||||||||||||
| Fairbanks | 8 | 99.7 | 8.8 | 1.4 | 17.7 | ||||||||||||
| Note(s): | Commercial building energy benchmarks are based off of the current stock of commercial buildings and are designed to provide a consistent baseline to compare building performance in energy-use simulations. The benchmark building had 40,946 square feet and 3 floors. Benchmark interior lighting energy = 13.02 thousand Btu/SF. Interior equipment energy consumption = 46.01 thousand Btu/SF. | ||||||||||||||||